On 14/05/14 01:22, Peter Ansell wrote:
On 14 May 2014 09:05, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
On 13/05/14 19:33, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
...
Unclarity:
org.kohsuke.metainf-services is MIT license? (not that source code is
included so not a blocker for me) but I can't find it in LICENCES* for
binaries.
https://github.com/kohsuke/metainf-services/blob/master/pom.xml
If that dependency is a problem we can easily replace the annotations
with static files. I have recently been replacing them in other
projects as they don't play nice with Eclipse and M2E, due to the M2E
assumption that an annotation processor will never create a resource.
No problem at all - the MIT license has attribution requirement which is
common in permissive licenses.
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
The binaries-with-dependencies is shipping the software.
Any project shipping with much javascript is going to end up with a lot
of LICENSE entries, one for each javascript library used, as it is so
common in that space and that's in the source release.
Andy
Cheers,
Peter
