[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15582633#comment-15582633
 ] 

Chandni Singh commented on APEXMALHAR-2284:
-------------------------------------------

I don't understand what constraint you are talking about.  Consider any 
concurrent data structure like  a concurrent hashmap.  If you do a simultaneous 
put and get,  you don't what value you get from the get call- it  can  be the 
old value or the new one. 

> POJOInnerJoinOperatorTest fails in Travis CI
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: APEXMALHAR-2284
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2284
>             Project: Apache Apex Malhar
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Thomas Weise
>            Assignee: Chaitanya
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.6.0
>
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/166322754/log.txt
> {code}
> Failed tests: 
>   POJOInnerJoinOperatorTest.testEmitMultipleTuplesFromStream2:337 Number of 
> tuple emitted  expected:<2> but was:<4>
>   POJOInnerJoinOperatorTest.testInnerJoinOperator:184 Number of tuple emitted 
>  expected:<1> but was:<2>
>   POJOInnerJoinOperatorTest.testMultipleValues:236 Number of tuple emitted  
> expected:<2> but was:<3>
>   POJOInnerJoinOperatorTest.testUpdateStream1Values:292 Number of tuple 
> emitted  expected:<1> but was:<2>
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to