[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15582633#comment-15582633
]
Chandni Singh commented on APEXMALHAR-2284:
-------------------------------------------
I don't understand what constraint you are talking about. Consider any
concurrent data structure like a concurrent hashmap. If you do a simultaneous
put and get, you don't what value you get from the get call- it can be the
old value or the new one.
> POJOInnerJoinOperatorTest fails in Travis CI
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: APEXMALHAR-2284
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2284
> Project: Apache Apex Malhar
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Thomas Weise
> Assignee: Chaitanya
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.6.0
>
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/166322754/log.txt
> {code}
> Failed tests:
> POJOInnerJoinOperatorTest.testEmitMultipleTuplesFromStream2:337 Number of
> tuple emitted expected:<2> but was:<4>
> POJOInnerJoinOperatorTest.testInnerJoinOperator:184 Number of tuple emitted
> expected:<1> but was:<2>
> POJOInnerJoinOperatorTest.testMultipleValues:236 Number of tuple emitted
> expected:<2> but was:<3>
> POJOInnerJoinOperatorTest.testUpdateStream1Values:292 Number of tuple
> emitted expected:<1> but was:<2>
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
