I would vote for dead PRs to be ideally closed. However, I was wondering if we are being too stringent on the timelines. The reason I raise this is in some of the previous pull requests I was told that the committer would be merging after waiting for a few days. Since the definition of few is not fixed, may I request we define some timelines for the commit time windows as well so that we have sufficient gap between these two time windows ?
Regards, Ananth > On 23 Sep 2017, at 11:48 am, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote: > > I'd suggest that a PR that lack an activity for more than a month is closed. > Any objections? > > Thank you, > > Vlad
