Thank you for the responses, everyone.  Since many of you value retaining
the history, let's work towards that.

Gavin has asked if we can give him until next week for a more thorough
status update on INFRA-10145.  Let's wait and see.  Maybe he'll find a way
to streamline the process.

--Chris Nauroth




On 9/10/15, 9:01 AM, "Sasha Parfenov" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Given the benefits of moving to ASF JIRA, option 3 sounds like the best
>way
>to go.
>
>On Thursday, September 10, 2015, Milind Barve <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for 3 from me as well.
>> On Sep 10, 2015 9:03 PM, "Amol Kekre" <[email protected]
>><javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for 3 for me. We have a lot of IP in the current jiras.
>> >
>> > Is this doable: Write a script to download key fields of the current
>> > Atlassian jira, and then create these in ASF jira only on those keys.
>>In
>> > the process flip the keys like "project" to correct key; and users to
>> > "annonymous", drop the watch list. The rest of the keys in a jira can
>>be
>> > updated manually as we work off the new jiras.
>> >
>> > In my view critical keys are: description, comments, type, priority,
>> > resolution, status
>> > // We can even add "From
>>https://malhar.atlassian.net/browse/MLHR-XXXX\n
>> "
>> > in the start of description
>> >
>> > Thks,
>> > Amol
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Pramod Immaneni
>><[email protected]
>> <javascript:;>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I would like to add +1 for 3.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:02 PM, Chris Nauroth
>><[email protected]
>> <javascript:;>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hello Apex devs,
>> > > >
>> > > > I'd like to share some new information about the ASF JIRA
>>migration,
>> > > > tracked in issue INFRA-10145.
>> > > >
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10145
>> > > >
>> > > > First, I'd like to take this opportunity to make sure the whole
>>Apex
>> > > > community knows that there are multiple means of contacting the
>> Apache
>> > > > infrastructure engineers.  This is documented here.
>> > > >
>> > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact
>> > > >
>> > > > My experience has always been that the infrastructure team is
>> > responsive,
>> > > > helpful and friendly.  Please feel free to contact them if
>>necessary.
>> > I
>> > > > typically start by filing an INFRA issue in JIRA, and then follow
>>up
>> in
>> > > > the HipChat channel if there is no response in JIRA after a few
>>days.
>> > > >
>> > > > I checked in at the HipChat channel today about our JIRA migration
>> > > status.
>> > > > Gavin, who is handling INFRA-10145 for us, was not available, but
>>the
>> > > > other infrastructure engineers pointed out a few challenges.  The
>> > version
>> > > > of JIRA in use hosted at Atlassian is different from the version
>> > > currently
>> > > > running in Apache.  In order to do an import, the versions must
>>match
>> > > > exactly, so our import actually would trigger an upgrade of ASF
>>JIRA.
>> > > > This would require planned downtime with at least 72 hours notice.
>> > After
>> > > > that, there would be some challenges with making sure imported
>>data
>> > > aligns
>> > > > with best practices used in ASF JIRA, such as using roles instead
>>of
>> > > > groups.  Considering all of this, the infrastructure team's
>> experience
>> > is
>> > > > that imports take a long time, even in the best case.
>> > > >
>> > > > The infrastructure team and I discussed a few options for moving
>> ahead.
>> > > >
>> > > > 1. Do not migrate to ASF JIRA.  The infrastructure team noted that
>> > there
>> > > > is nothing in the incubation process that mandates moving off of
>>your
>> > > > Atlassian hosted instance.  I had not been aware of this.
>> > > >
>> > > > 2. Move to ASF JIRA, but skip the import, and start with a clean
>> slate.
>> > > >
>> > > > 3. Move to ASF JIRA now, but allow the import activity to
>>continue in
>> > the
>> > > > background.  Once we start using ASF JIRA though, imported issues
>> would
>> > > > not be able to land in the same project key.  They'd likely have
>>to
>> > > remain
>> > > > under the old project keys used at the Atlassian instance.
>> > > >
>> > > > 4. Keep waiting for the migration with the understanding that it
>>will
>> > > take
>> > > > time to complete.
>> > > >
>> > > > I'd like to gauge the Apex community's opinion on how to proceed.
>> My
>> > own
>> > > > opinion is that it would be beneficial to move to ASF JIRA, so I'd
>> > prefer
>> > > > to rule out option 1.  One of the benefits of Apex is its
>>integration
>> > > with
>> > > > numerous other Apache projects, and it can be useful to share the
>> same
>> > > > JIRA instance with those other projects.  For example, if you
>>trace
>> the
>> > > > root cause of an Apex issue into HDFS, and you want to contact an
>> HDFS
>> > > > engineer, you can ask me for feedback by entering @cnauroth on a
>> > comment.
>> > > > If you remain in the Atlassian instance, it's not guaranteed that
>> > > > contributors on other Apache projects will have an account there.
>> If
>> > the
>> > > > issue is confirmed as an HDFS bug, you can then link your Apex
>>issue
>> to
>> > > > the corresponding HDFS issue for easy navigation.  I don't believe
>> this
>> > > > would work as cleanly in the Atlassian instance.
>> > > >
>> > > > My preference is option 2 for simplicity.  However, this has the
>>side
>> > > > effect of discarding past history.  Does the Apex community
>>consider
>> > the
>> > > > past history to be important?  Is it important enough to preserve
>>the
>> > > past
>> > > > history that you're willing to wait longer for a migration?
>> > > >
>> > > > Please let me know your thoughts.
>> > > >
>> > > > --Chris Nauroth
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to