Chris,
Thanks for helping. We need history, and can make it work for Gavin if
there is a way out. We can work on which fields to drop etc.

Thks
Amol

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thank you for the responses, everyone.  Since many of you value retaining
> the history, let's work towards that.
>
> Gavin has asked if we can give him until next week for a more thorough
> status update on INFRA-10145.  Let's wait and see.  Maybe he'll find a way
> to streamline the process.
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
>
>
>
> On 9/10/15, 9:01 AM, "Sasha Parfenov" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Given the benefits of moving to ASF JIRA, option 3 sounds like the best
> >way
> >to go.
> >
> >On Thursday, September 10, 2015, Milind Barve <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for 3 from me as well.
> >> On Sep 10, 2015 9:03 PM, "Amol Kekre" <[email protected]
> >><javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1 for 3 for me. We have a lot of IP in the current jiras.
> >> >
> >> > Is this doable: Write a script to download key fields of the current
> >> > Atlassian jira, and then create these in ASF jira only on those keys.
> >>In
> >> > the process flip the keys like "project" to correct key; and users to
> >> > "annonymous", drop the watch list. The rest of the keys in a jira can
> >>be
> >> > updated manually as we work off the new jiras.
> >> >
> >> > In my view critical keys are: description, comments, type, priority,
> >> > resolution, status
> >> > // We can even add "From
> >>https://malhar.atlassian.net/browse/MLHR-XXXX\n
> >> "
> >> > in the start of description
> >> >
> >> > Thks,
> >> > Amol
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Pramod Immaneni
> >><[email protected]
> >> <javascript:;>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I would like to add +1 for 3.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > >
> >> > > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:02 PM, Chris Nauroth
> >><[email protected]
> >> <javascript:;>>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Hello Apex devs,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'd like to share some new information about the ASF JIRA
> >>migration,
> >> > > > tracked in issue INFRA-10145.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10145
> >> > > >
> >> > > > First, I'd like to take this opportunity to make sure the whole
> >>Apex
> >> > > > community knows that there are multiple means of contacting the
> >> Apache
> >> > > > infrastructure engineers.  This is documented here.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact
> >> > > >
> >> > > > My experience has always been that the infrastructure team is
> >> > responsive,
> >> > > > helpful and friendly.  Please feel free to contact them if
> >>necessary.
> >> > I
> >> > > > typically start by filing an INFRA issue in JIRA, and then follow
> >>up
> >> in
> >> > > > the HipChat channel if there is no response in JIRA after a few
> >>days.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I checked in at the HipChat channel today about our JIRA migration
> >> > > status.
> >> > > > Gavin, who is handling INFRA-10145 for us, was not available, but
> >>the
> >> > > > other infrastructure engineers pointed out a few challenges.  The
> >> > version
> >> > > > of JIRA in use hosted at Atlassian is different from the version
> >> > > currently
> >> > > > running in Apache.  In order to do an import, the versions must
> >>match
> >> > > > exactly, so our import actually would trigger an upgrade of ASF
> >>JIRA.
> >> > > > This would require planned downtime with at least 72 hours notice.
> >> > After
> >> > > > that, there would be some challenges with making sure imported
> >>data
> >> > > aligns
> >> > > > with best practices used in ASF JIRA, such as using roles instead
> >>of
> >> > > > groups.  Considering all of this, the infrastructure team's
> >> experience
> >> > is
> >> > > > that imports take a long time, even in the best case.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The infrastructure team and I discussed a few options for moving
> >> ahead.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 1. Do not migrate to ASF JIRA.  The infrastructure team noted that
> >> > there
> >> > > > is nothing in the incubation process that mandates moving off of
> >>your
> >> > > > Atlassian hosted instance.  I had not been aware of this.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 2. Move to ASF JIRA, but skip the import, and start with a clean
> >> slate.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 3. Move to ASF JIRA now, but allow the import activity to
> >>continue in
> >> > the
> >> > > > background.  Once we start using ASF JIRA though, imported issues
> >> would
> >> > > > not be able to land in the same project key.  They'd likely have
> >>to
> >> > > remain
> >> > > > under the old project keys used at the Atlassian instance.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 4. Keep waiting for the migration with the understanding that it
> >>will
> >> > > take
> >> > > > time to complete.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'd like to gauge the Apex community's opinion on how to proceed.
> >> My
> >> > own
> >> > > > opinion is that it would be beneficial to move to ASF JIRA, so I'd
> >> > prefer
> >> > > > to rule out option 1.  One of the benefits of Apex is its
> >>integration
> >> > > with
> >> > > > numerous other Apache projects, and it can be useful to share the
> >> same
> >> > > > JIRA instance with those other projects.  For example, if you
> >>trace
> >> the
> >> > > > root cause of an Apex issue into HDFS, and you want to contact an
> >> HDFS
> >> > > > engineer, you can ask me for feedback by entering @cnauroth on a
> >> > comment.
> >> > > > If you remain in the Atlassian instance, it's not guaranteed that
> >> > > > contributors on other Apache projects will have an account there.
> >> If
> >> > the
> >> > > > issue is confirmed as an HDFS bug, you can then link your Apex
> >>issue
> >> to
> >> > > > the corresponding HDFS issue for easy navigation.  I don't believe
> >> this
> >> > > > would work as cleanly in the Atlassian instance.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > My preference is option 2 for simplicity.  However, this has the
> >>side
> >> > > > effect of discarding past history.  Does the Apex community
> >>consider
> >> > the
> >> > > > past history to be important?  Is it important enough to preserve
> >>the
> >> > > past
> >> > > > history that you're willing to wait longer for a migration?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Please let me know your thoughts.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --Chris Nauroth
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to