An additional consideration is the license header in each source file. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-legal-aud it
I had started a patch to do this in Core, hoping to make it my first actual source level contribution to the project. :-) I just attached the work in progress to Apache JIRA APEXCORE-1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-1 (Please note that this issue might get wiped and need to get recreated when infra does the migration from Atlassian JIRA.) The patch adds the standard Apache RAT plugin to the build process and updates numerous files to add the license header, in response to the warnings I saw from RAT. I think the big piece remaining is updating each .java file. Right now, they show a copyright by DataTorrent, Inc. instead of referencing ASF. For some reason, the RAT plugin isn't warning on these, but they would need to get updated. Then, of course, the whole exercise would need to get repeated in Malhar. --Chris Nauroth On 9/18/15, 8:25 AM, "Thomas Weise" <[email protected]> wrote: >Aniruddha, > >Thanks, and feel free to create tickets for items you would like to work >on. > >One area that is not directly related but will have great impact are the >pull request checks. > >Thomas > >On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Aniruddha Thombare < >[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to help Thomas in RM process. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Aniruddha >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > We would like to make 3.2.0 the first release after incubation. >> > >> > Target is to branch for 3.2 at the end of this month (September) and >>then >> > exercise the ASF compliant release process to get the release out by >>end >> of >> > October latest. >> > >> > I would like to volunteer as RM for this release. I found the >>guidelines >> > here: >> > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html >> > >> > Where would the mentors see the bar for this initial release? Anything >> > beyond the check list to watch out for, advice for prioritization? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Thomas >> > >>
