How did you update those files to have the license included in them? There is a license-maven-plugin which we used before to apply license to all the interesting files using
mvn license:format Is there a recommended alternative for automatically formatting licenses across hoards of file? Separately: should we encourage the patches or pull requests on Github? -- Chetan On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> wrote: > An additional consideration is the license header in each source file. > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-legal-aud > it > > > I had started a patch to do this in Core, hoping to make it my first > actual source level contribution to the project. :-) I just attached the > work in progress to Apache JIRA APEXCORE-1. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-1 > > > (Please note that this issue might get wiped and need to get recreated > when infra does the migration from Atlassian JIRA.) > > The patch adds the standard Apache RAT plugin to the build process and > updates numerous files to add the license header, in response to the > warnings I saw from RAT. > > I think the big piece remaining is updating each .java file. Right now, > they show a copyright by DataTorrent, Inc. instead of referencing ASF. > For some reason, the RAT plugin isn't warning on these, but they would > need to get updated. > > Then, of course, the whole exercise would need to get repeated in Malhar. > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 9/18/15, 8:25 AM, "Thomas Weise" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Aniruddha, > > > >Thanks, and feel free to create tickets for items you would like to work > >on. > > > >One area that is not directly related but will have great impact are the > >pull request checks. > > > >Thomas > > > >On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Aniruddha Thombare < > >[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to help Thomas in RM process. > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> > >> Aniruddha > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > We would like to make 3.2.0 the first release after incubation. > >> > > >> > Target is to branch for 3.2 at the end of this month (September) and > >>then > >> > exercise the ASF compliant release process to get the release out by > >>end > >> of > >> > October latest. > >> > > >> > I would like to volunteer as RM for this release. I found the > >>guidelines > >> > here: > >> > > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > >> > > >> > Where would the mentors see the bar for this initial release? Anything > >> > beyond the check list to watch out for, advice for prioritization? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Thomas > >> > > >> > >
