Hi,

Looks like Netbeans- Organize Imports plugin doesn't let unmatched imports
to be in between different groups.

It will only place at the bottom. The plugin has no way of specifying
unmatched imports.

Do we need to reconsider the import order when one of the IDEs doesn't
provide such basic functionality?

Chandni



On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:42 AM, David Yan <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1!
> On Sep 29, 2015 10:41 AM, "Thomas Weise" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Excellent!
> >
> > --
> > sent from mobile
> > On Sep 29, 2015 1:20 PM, "Chandni Singh" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thomas,
> > >
> > > I am creating configurations for intellij, eclipse and netbeans so that
> > > will take care of setting the right import order (APEX-151).
> > >
> > > Chandni
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > My top criteria is automation in the IDE(s). Don't want to fiddle
> with
> > > > imports manually to keep checkstyle happy.
> > > >
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Pramod Immaneni <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I would go with * imports after com.* otherwise the other points
> you
> > > > > mention are fine.  I agree with the point that it is not possible
> to
> > > > bunch
> > > > > static with their groups in IntelliJ, if it did it would be great.
> I
> > > > prefer
> > > > > them at the bottom.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Chandni Singh <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I see a difference between your suggestion and Chetan's import
> > order.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > com.datatorrent.* is always the lowest one and I think static
> > imports
> > > > are
> > > > > > not at the bottom in Chetan's.  Static imports for each group are
> > > > present
> > > > > > below that group. His order is something like:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > com.* imports
> > > > > >
> > > > > > org.* imports
> > > > > >
> > > > > > org.apache.* imports
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * imports
> > > > > >
> > > > > > com.*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > com.datatorrent.* imports
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chetan please confirm.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > About static imports I think it should be either top or bottom
> > > because
> > > > it
> > > > > > is quite difficult to configure the in-flow order with
> > > > eclipse/intellij.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chandni
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Pramod Immaneni <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I prefer the following order which I borrowed from Chetan a
> while
> > > > back
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > all java/javax imports
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > com.* imports
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > org.* imports
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > org.apache.* imports
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > com.datatorrent.* imports
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * imports
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > all static imports
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The rationale is as you go down the list you have more
> > > > > > control/flexibility
> > > > > > > on names for what you want to include.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Chandni Singh <
> > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you have issues with the current import order, please
> > respond
> > > to
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > thread.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't have any strong opinions on the order of static and
> 3rd
> > > > party
> > > > > > > > library imports because I seldom refer to imports and to me
> in
> > > this
> > > > > > case
> > > > > > > > only consistency is of utmost importance.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If ordering of imports or placement of static imports are
> very
> > > > > > important
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > you then please respond here.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Also Checkstyle is mature enough to handle different styles
> of
> > > > import
> > > > > > > > placement so we don't need more plugins to achieve this.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We need to reach on a consensus soon so that already merged
> > > > > checkstyle
> > > > > > > rule
> > > > > > > > can be modified.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Chandni
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Chandni Singh <
> > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Following is the import order:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The import order is following:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > all static imports
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > all java/javax imports
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > org.* imports
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > com.* imports
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > * imports
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > com.datatorrent.* imports
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Each group is lexicographically sorted and separated by an
> > > empty
> > > > > > line.
> > > > > > > > > Please configure your IDEs to do so.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I am working on APEX-151 <
> > > > > > https://malhar.atlassian.net/browse/APEX-151
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > meanwhile
> > > > > > > > > to provide settings for commonly used IDEs.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Chandni
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to