How many import order violations exist now in Apex-core and Apex-malhar?
Is there a way to fix them as one single batch using maven plugin or IDE
auto format?
Thank you,
Vlad
On 9/30/15 07:19, Chandni Singh wrote:
Actually keeping static imports at the bottom didn't increase rather
decreased the existing violation in Apex-core.
We have not followed any consistent style so far so this is the result of
that. As and when a person touches a file they can correct the import order.
Chandni
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Priyanka Gugale <[email protected]>
wrote:
No, there are few classes in Apex-cor and Apex-malhar
e.g. StreamPersistanceTests, PojoUtilsTest etc. Even for Ingestion we used
to keep static imports on top.
We might have to change them once we add these templates.
-Priyanka
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]>
wrote:
Is it a binary file? If so, it does not belong into this repo.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]>
wrote:
Pramod,
Please advise.
Chandni
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Chandni Singh <
[email protected]
wrote:
Tim fixed the plugin. We can add the nbm file at the same location
where
we add the configuration for netbeans.
The readme will let the users know that they need to install this
version
of Organize Imports.
Chandni
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:51 PM, David Yan <[email protected]>
wrote:
I think it's important to have all 3 major IDE's to support whatever
we
determine to be the import order.
David
On Sep 29, 2015 6:42 PM, "Chandni Singh" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
Looks like Netbeans- Organize Imports plugin doesn't let unmatched
imports
to be in between different groups.
It will only place at the bottom. The plugin has no way of
specifying
unmatched imports.
Do we need to reconsider the import order when one of the IDEs
doesn't
provide such basic functionality?
Chandni
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:42 AM, David Yan <
[email protected]>
wrote:
+1!
On Sep 29, 2015 10:41 AM, "Thomas Weise" <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Excellent!
--
sent from mobile
On Sep 29, 2015 1:20 PM, "Chandni Singh" <
[email protected]
wrote:
Thomas,
I am creating configurations for intellij, eclipse and
netbeans
so
that
will take care of setting the right import order (APEX-151).
Chandni
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Thomas Weise <
[email protected]>
wrote:
My top criteria is automation in the IDE(s). Don't want to
fiddle
with
imports manually to keep checkstyle happy.
Thomas
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Pramod Immaneni <
[email protected]>
wrote:
I would go with * imports after com.* otherwise the
other
points
you
mention are fine. I agree with the point that it is not
possible
to
bunch
static with their groups in IntelliJ, if it did it would
be
great.
I
prefer
them at the bottom.
Thanks
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Chandni Singh <
[email protected]>
wrote:
I see a difference between your suggestion and
Chetan's
import
order.
com.datatorrent.* is always the lowest one and I think
static
imports
are
not at the bottom in Chetan's. Static imports for
each
group
are
present
below that group. His order is something like:
com.* imports
org.* imports
org.apache.* imports
* imports
com.*
com.datatorrent.* imports
Chetan please confirm.
About static imports I think it should be either top
or
bottom
because
it
is quite difficult to configure the in-flow order with
eclipse/intellij.
Chandni
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Pramod Immaneni <
[email protected]
wrote:
I prefer the following order which I borrowed from
Chetan
a
while
back
all java/javax imports
com.* imports
org.* imports
org.apache.* imports
com.datatorrent.* imports
* imports
all static imports
The rationale is as you go down the list you have
more
control/flexibility
on names for what you want to include.
Thanks
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Chandni Singh <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi All,
If you have issues with the current import order,
please
respond
to
this
thread.
I don't have any strong opinions on the order of
static
and
3rd
party
library imports because I seldom refer to imports
and
to me
in
this
case
only consistency is of utmost importance.
If ordering of imports or placement of static
imports
are
very
important
to
you then please respond here.
Also Checkstyle is mature enough to handle
different
styles
of
import
placement so we don't need more plugins to achieve
this.
We need to reach on a consensus soon so that
already
merged
checkstyle
rule
can be modified.
Chandni
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Chandni Singh <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
Following is the import order:
The import order is following:
all static imports
all java/javax imports
org.* imports
com.* imports
* imports
com.datatorrent.* imports
Each group is lexicographically sorted and
separated
by
an
empty
line.
Please configure your IDEs to do so.
I am working on APEX-151 <
https://malhar.atlassian.net/browse/APEX-151
meanwhile
to provide settings for commonly used IDEs.
Thanks,
Chandni
