Tim and I have merged AbstractFileOutputOperator changes to release-3.2.

Thanks,
Chandni

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Yes will do by today.
> On Nov 5, 2015 2:09 PM, "Thomas Weise" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We have currently 34 issues for this version, 4 of them remain to be
>> resolved (or moved out).
>>
>> https://malhar.atlassian.net/projects/MLHR/versions/11702
>>
>> Chandni, as discussed we would like to include the
>> AbstractFileOutputOperator changes.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Everyone processing PRs please review the guidelines:
>> >
>> > http://apex.incubator.apache.org/contributing.html
>> >
>> > Until further notice, the committer merging the PR is responsible to set
>> > the fixVersion.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> MLHR-1886, MLHR-1889 can be a part of 3.2.0 as well.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > There should be a large amount of issues:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://malhar.atlassian.net/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Malhar%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.2.0%20or%20(fixVersion%20is%20EMPTY%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed)
>> >> >
>> >> > Looks like everything updated since September should be included?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > We want to prepare the 3.2.0 release for Malhar.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I only see 2 issues showing up for this version:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > https://malhar.atlassian.net/projects/MLHR/versions/11702
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I suspect many issue don't have the fixVersion set? Anyone wants to
>> >> > > volunteer to review and fix this?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Also, are there any other, open tickets you may know of that
>> should be
>> >> > > resolved for this release?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> > > Thomas
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to