Thomas, this is what I'm going to do. But I like Pramod's idea to have an
annotation

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Why not implement the interface on the operator and delegate the call to
> the partitioner implementation?
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pramod Immaneni <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Idea for an annotation maybe?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Siyuan Hua <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Sometimes I want to separate the Partitioner logic from operator and
> > still
> > > I want to have default partitioner for the operator (with specifying it
> > > from application)
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Siyuan
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to