I also think property works better because as Thomas mentioned it can be configured like any other operator component.
Thanks - Gaurav > On Nov 19, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Isha Arkatkar <[email protected]> wrote: > > I also think property works better, though, can be an easier API to 'set > number of partitions for operator to N' And internally it can pick up > Stateless Partitioner as default? > > Thanks, > Isha > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I actually think a property works better as it will let you configure the >> partitioner like any other operator component. Like the Kafka consumer. >> >> -- >> sent from mobile >> On Nov 19, 2015 4:51 PM, "Siyuan Hua" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thomas, this is what I'm going to do. But I like Pramod's idea to have an >>> annotation >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Why not implement the interface on the operator and delegate the call >> to >>>> the partitioner implementation? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pramod Immaneni < >> [email protected] >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Idea for an annotation maybe? >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Siyuan Hua <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sometimes I want to separate the Partitioner logic from operator >> and >>>>> still >>>>>> I want to have default partitioner for the operator (with >> specifying >>> it >>>>>> from application) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Siyuan >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
