Tim,

This setting used to work fine earlier. What did we change/add in App master 
that is causing this behavior. We should know the reason before bumping the 
memory. May be there is some other issue.

Thanks
- Gaurav

> On Dec 23, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I am ok with 1280MB.
> On 24 Dec 2015 06:34, "Timothy Farkas" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> If there are no objections I will open a pull request shortly to bump up
>> the default App Master Memory to 1280 MB. I recently got burned by this
>> default AGAIN when the App Master randomly died in the middle of demo. The
>> demo application was small and only had 6 physical operators.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Munagala Ramanath <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Sorry, meant to say 4-6GB, not MB.
>>> 
>>> Ram
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Munagala Ramanath <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'm OK with increasing it to 1280MB.
>>>> 
>>>> I agree with Sandeep about new people trying out Apex,
>>>> often on limited environments like VMs limited to 4-6MB. With a default
>>> of
>>>> 0.5GB per Buffer Server
>>>> and 1GB per operator, things start to fail when the user has more than
>> a
>>>> handful of operators.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm guessing it's not just the number of the operators that puts memory
>>>> pressure on master memory
>>>> but the size of the jars that get pulled in by all the operator classes
>>>> and their dependencies. If this is
>>>> true, one could cause failure even with a single, sufficiently complex
>>>> operator.
>>>> 
>>>> Ram
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Timothy Farkas <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Sandeep,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have seen the issue even with small apps like Twitter Demo. It
>> happens
>>>>> less frequently in very small apps but the issue is still there. It
>>>>> happens
>>>>> frequently in medium size apps (10 containers). Could we increase the
>>>>> MASTER_MEMORY_MB to 1280 instead of 2048? That way we can get greater
>>>>> stability with the defaults settings without allocating too much
>>>>> additional
>>>>> memory?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Tim
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Sandeep Deshmukh <
>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> With large number of containers, the problem becomes severe and I
>> too
>>>>> have
>>>>>> faced it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Not sure if default should be increased as that should work in most
>> of
>>>>> the
>>>>>> cases and even when new people are trying out Apex for the first
>> time.
>>>>>> They may not have enough memory.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Sandeep
>>>>>> On 13 Dec 2015 11:30, "Ganelin, Ilya" <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tim - great point, we reduce the memory consumption for operators
>>> and
>>>>> do
>>>>>>> actually increase it for the app master, especially when we have
>>> more
>>>>>>> operators. I misread your original email.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> Ilya Ganelin
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Timothy Farkas [[email protected]<mailto:
>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2015 11:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Default App Master Container Memory Size
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Ilya,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dou you reduce the memory to 256 mb for operators only or for the
>>> App
>>>>>>> Master as well?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Ganelin, Ilya <
>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Tim - in our applications we've actually tried to go with
>> smaller
>>>>>>>> containers, as small as 256 MB, simply because many operators
>>> don't
>>>>>>> demand
>>>>>>>> any memory and this allows us to run more partitions.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We haven't noticed performance degradation.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>> Ilya Ganelin
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Timothy Farkas [[email protected]<mailto:
>>>>> [email protected]>]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2015 11:02 PM Eastern Standard Time
>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Subject: Default App Master Container Memory Size
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The default value for MASTER_MEMORY_MB is 1024. I've observed in
>>>>>> multiple
>>>>>>>> demo apps and in the production apps of some of our users that
>>> 1024
>>>>> MB
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> not enough memory, and the app master dies. This was observed on
>>>>> small
>>>>>>>> applications with 5 - 20 containers. I think the default app
>>> master
>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>> size should be 2048.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Any feedback?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>>>> ________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
>>>>>>>> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be
>>>>> used
>>>>>>>> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The
>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual
>> or
>>>>>> entity
>>>>>>>> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not
>> the
>>>>>>> intended
>>>>>>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
>>> retransmission,
>>>>>>>> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking
>> of
>>>>> any
>>>>>>>> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited.
>>> If
>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> have received this communication in error, please contact the
>>> sender
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> delete the material from your computer.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
>>>>>>> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be
>>> used
>>>>>>> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The
>>>>>> information
>>>>>>> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or
>>>>> entity
>>>>>>> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the
>>>>>> intended
>>>>>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
>> retransmission,
>>>>>>> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of
>>> any
>>>>>>> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited.
>> If
>>>>> you
>>>>>>> have received this communication in error, please contact the
>> sender
>>>>> and
>>>>>>> delete the material from your computer.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to