Mike Traum wrote: > OK, that methodology makes sense. But, the problem is is that Oo > 1.1.4 (and I would assume previous versions) installation does not > give you the choice to install for the system or for your user and > will always install it for your user. Oo 1.9 does give your this > choice and defaults to system. So, I think many people will be > experiencing this problem. (I'm testing against Windows XP Pro and > installing both 1.1 and 1.9 under the same user, which has admin > rights).
If you install OOo1.x with -net it should install for system, not for user. Or does my memory fool me here?! The installation with "-net" is the recommended default installation for OOo1.x. > BTW, why is that exception thrown? It seems to me that even if it's > finding the 1.1 installation, it should work. Does Oo 1.1 not support > the Bootstrap? Is the Bootstrap not backward compatible? If it's > either of these, shouldn't the Bootstrap search HKEY_CURRENT_USER and > if it can't find a compatible version, search HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE? OOo1.x does not support the new bootstrap mechanism, so it fails. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
