On Monday 10 September 2007, Tobias Krais wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
>
> [...]
>
> >> I think I've been told, and likely here, that in 2.0.x, print
> >> listeners like this are no longer necessary, but I'm having a bit
> >> of a problem searching and finding this comment and what the
> >> background is.
> >>
> >> In 2.0.x, can I print, then close the document without listening
> >> for when the print job is done?  Can someone confirm this for me? 
> >> I've been stuck on this problem for about a month (I thought it
> >> was other possibilities, and had another couple issues as well)
> >> and I'm at a point where I need to solve it and my client is,
> >> understandably, anxious about it.
> >
> > Tried it without the print listener and it crashed.  Guess it still
> > needs listeners.
>
> I wrote a little Java program being able to do the same you want to
> do. It opens a document, prints it and closes it. Calling the program
> again prints the next document,...
>
> I also ran into troubles without the print listener. Closing the
> document too fast will crash the print job. A print job listener is
> good for other reasons, too.
>
> I can send you my code if needed. Its an easy thing. But well, its
> late in Europe and you wont get much help around this time...

Code would be a big help so I could compare what we've got.  I'll be 
glad to send you what I have.  Right now I'm working with a wrapper 
class to handle basic functions.  Do I understand, though, that you run 
the program once for each file you print?  Or does it loop through and 
print multiple files without being re-run?

It's not on this topic, but I see you had a question about getting the 
list of printers in BASIC.  I can't do that, but I do have a routine 
that gets the lists of printers on a system from Java.  It doesn't work 
directly with OOo, but it can get all the printers.  Will that help 
you?

Hal

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to