Hi Thorsten, >>> Who decides? >> Difficult ... Having a gatekeeper (or multiple fatekeepers) does not >> really sounds feasible. I would hope that discussing the changes in >> public until a consensus is reached would work out. >> > Uh, well. While I appreciate striving for consent, this tends to not > work so well among hackers
Indeed. (By the way: This holds for developers, too :-P ) > but really no strong feelings here, I'd > just suggest to have a tie-breaking rule in case sufficient > discussion did not result in a consensus... I'd say we need a set of highly proficient and highly respected architects, whose opinion should, at least, be weighted high. Hmm. There's more to say about this, but for the moment, I'd like to hear more opinions on the topic in general, on a possible rule set, on possible constraints, and so on. Before we don't clarify those, it's useless to discuss the approval process. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [email protected] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
