On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Mathias Bauer <nospamfor...@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi Mathias, > The best documentation is an API that doesn't need one. This deals with > the fact that people don't like to read documentation. Having "speaking" > names for events is a good thing per se, not just some "language > aesthetics". I totally agree here. I'd vote for better event names (= self explanatory). As an extension / component developer I have no problem with event name modification / removal / ... in 4.x, 5.x, ... even from our business application point of view. It's just minor incompatiblity, which can be easily fixed and will lead to shorter documentation = in our source code, in OO.o API documentation. -- Robert Vojta --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@api.openoffice.org
