Hello Matthias, On Tuesday 12 May 2009, 06:06, Matthias B. wrote: > That you even consider removing this event is exactly the lack of > commitment to compatibility I have critized in the long thread about > OOo quality recently.
I'm not sure what you're meaning with "lack of commitment to compatibility", but this cannot refer to OOo API incompatible changes: OOo's API is so mummyfied, that I find it a very unique case compared to other FOSS project's API. (may be "lack of commitment to compatibility" means that changes in the implementation break exisitn API?) Anyway, if by "lack of commitment to compatibility" you mean that you don't want any API change at all, it seems then that you missed the discussion at http://api.openoffice.org/servlets/BrowseList?list=dev&by=thread&from=2222377 For what I understood, there is a general agreement to allow incompatible API changes. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@api.openoffice.org
