Hi Malte, > Well, you attended the meeting about AWT improvements with Carsten many > month (or years?!) ago, where we discussed this. > > Maybe you can dig out what our conclusion was that time, maybe with some > arguments? ;) > > Then feel free to use that information and start a discussion thread > specific to AWT API improvements...
Hmm? I think I do not get you here. I do not have any plans to start an "improve the AWT toolkit" project here and now. That's just not my focus at the moment. Are you seriously suggesting that we should not do the small and innocent change, but aim for the make-everybody-happy solution instead? Is there a good reason to not do the changes incrementally? And no, "we once decided against getter methods since they are synchronously" is *not* a good reason, sorry. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer frank.schoenh...@sun.com - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@api.openoffice.org
