On 24.12.2010 11:20, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> That's the point: not all of OOo is written in C++ anymore, there are >> quite important subsystems written in Java. >> >> One premiere example is the scripting subsystem, which makes JavaScript, >> BeanShell, ooRexx and others available to OOo. Removing Java removes all >> these options and renders programs written in these languages useless. >> >> Another premiere example is the Java-API-interface to the entire OOo. >> Removing Java removes the ability to use OOo from Java and to deploy all >> Java applications that use OOo. >> >> Therefore the conclusion, that removing Java from OOo yields OOo to be >> badly crippled. >> >> > So people who need these features won't use LO. Where is the problem? > There is no problem, unless the LO people found a problem in the Java support for OOo and are therefore removing it in their distribution. And if that is the case I would like to know the reasons. Currently it seems that there are no technical reasons for this move/decision.
---rony --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@api.openoffice.org
