On 12/27/10 11:24 AM, Andreas Säger wrote: > Am 27.12.2010 09:22, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> At the moment there is indeed no real technical reason to remove Java. >> Ok on Mac OS there exists some problems (only a few use cases) but i >> hope that this can be solved in the future. >> > > Technical reasons: > More dependencies than necessary. > Compare the cold start times with and without Java. > >> Sorry that i have put this sentence with removing Java in LibO in the >> game. > > It was Rony who asked a reasonable question in the subject line. From my > point of view it would be possible to remove the Java dependencies from > the built-in features once you dropped the embedded HSQLDB which proves > to be failing since 5 years by now. as far as i know Java is not started directly, only if some features are used that depends on Java. But that is not the case from the beginning. Related to the DB features that might be true i don't know because i don't really use it.
> I do understand that Java is a holy cow for Oracle employees but you > will not stop the discussion about it. ;-) i don't think so, but Java is besides Python the only reliable way to add new components as extensions. Well i talk not about macros etc. Juergen > > Good Slide! (as we say in German), > Andreas Säger > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@api.openoffice.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@api.openoffice.org
