What about using the name `apisix-base` instead of `apisix-openresty`?
Joey Ma <majun...@apache.org> 于2021年9月27日周一 下午2:03写道： > > +1 on my side. > That sounds really great. Thanks. > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:10 AM Ayush das <ayush24...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 Sounds good to me > > > > Best regards > > Ayush Das<https://github.com/iamayushdas> > > > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 at 9:33 PM, Jintao Zhang <zhangjintao9...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 LGTM! > > > > > > ZhengSong Tu <tzssanggl...@gmail.com> 于2021年9月26日周日 下午7:54写道： > > > > > > > Good for me, +1 > > > > *ZhengSong Tu* > > > > My GitHub: https://github.com/tzssangglass > > > > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix > > > > > > > > > > > > wei jin <k...@apache.org> 于2021年9月26日周日 下午6:56写道： > > > > > > > > > Hi, community, > > > > > > > > > > The current APISIX image depends on the official version of > > openresty, > > > > but > > > > > APISIX needs to support more functions. > > > > > > > > > > For example, to integrate dubbo, you need to integrate > > > > > https://github.com/api7/mod_dubbo. > > > > > Or, some advanced features of APISIX, need to integrate > > > > > https://github.com/api7/ngx_multi_upstream_module and > > > > > https://github.com/api7/lua-var-nginx-module, and so on. > > > > > > > > > > All these basic modules do not change frequently and can be > > solidified > > > to > > > > > become a brand new openresty basic image (we can call it > > > > > `apisix-openresty`). > > > > > > > > > > I propose to change the dockerfile under the `Apache/apisix-docker` > > > > > repository to integrate the apisix-openresty base image. > > > > > Of course, we need to provide the dockerfile of apisix-openresty > > > > > separately. > > > > > > > > > > Welcome to discuss: > > > > > +1 I agree. > > > > > -1 I have something else to say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
