`apisix-base` +1, It is a good idea to package the openresty image dedicated to apisix so that users can use all the functions of APISIX at low cost.
Joey Ma <majun...@apache.org> 于2021年9月28日周二 下午4:11写道： > Yep, I've to admit that `apisix-base` is much better. > So change my mind, +1 for `apisix-base`. > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:58 PM JunXu Chen <chenju...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 `apisix-base` is better. > > > > On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 15:55, YuanSheng Wang <membp...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > +1 `apisix-base` is better. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:45 PM wei jin <k...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > I think `apisix-base` will be better than `apisix-openresty`. > > > > > > > > Zexuan Luo <spacewan...@apache.org> 于2021年9月28日周二 下午3:38写道： > > > > > > > > > What about using the name `apisix-base` instead of > > `apisix-openresty`? > > > > > > > > > > Joey Ma <majun...@apache.org> 于2021年9月27日周一 下午2:03写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 on my side. > > > > > > That sounds really great. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:10 AM Ayush das <ayush24...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 Sounds good to me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > > Ayush Das<https://github.com/iamayushdas> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 at 9:33 PM, Jintao Zhang < > > > > > zhangjintao9...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 LGTM! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ZhengSong Tu <tzssanggl...@gmail.com> 于2021年9月26日周日 > 下午7:54写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good for me, +1 > > > > > > > > > *ZhengSong Tu* > > > > > > > > > My GitHub: https://github.com/tzssangglass > > > > > > > > > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wei jin <k...@apache.org> 于2021年9月26日周日 下午6:56写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, community, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The current APISIX image depends on the official version > of > > > > > > > openresty, > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > APISIX needs to support more functions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, to integrate dubbo, you need to integrate > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/api7/mod_dubbo. > > > > > > > > > > Or, some advanced features of APISIX, need to integrate > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/api7/ngx_multi_upstream_module and > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/api7/lua-var-nginx-module, and so on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All these basic modules do not change frequently and can > be > > > > > > > solidified > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > become a brand new openresty basic image (we can call it > > > > > > > > > > `apisix-openresty`). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose to change the dockerfile under the > > > > > `Apache/apisix-docker` > > > > > > > > > > repository to integrate the apisix-openresty base image. > > > > > > > > > > Of course, we need to provide the dockerfile of > > > > apisix-openresty > > > > > > > > > > separately. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Welcome to discuss: > > > > > > > > > > +1 I agree. > > > > > > > > > > -1 I have something else to say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > *MembPhis* > > > My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis > > > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix > > > > > > -- Thanks, Janko
