LGTM

On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM Xin Rong <alins...@apache.org> wrote:

> In the earliest versions, APISIX used Openresty as the runtime, but
> OpenResty often failed to meet APISIX's scalability needs. To solve
> this problem, we built apisix-base and have been running on it for
> over a year.
>
>
> For example, these features can only run in the apisix-base environment:
>
> * upstream.tls: Enables secure communication between APISIX and
> upstream servers.
> * etcd.tls: Enables secure communication between APISIX and etcd clusters.
> * xrpc/redis: The Redis protocol support allows APISIX to proxy Redis
> commands, and provide various features according to the content of the
> commands.
> * Dubbo proxy: Supports proxying Apache Dubbo requests.
> * client-control Plugin: The client-control Plugin can be used to
> dynamically control the behavior of NGINX to handle a client request,
> by setting the max size of the request body.
> * Gzip Plugin: The gzip Plugin dynamically sets the behavior of gzip in
> Nginx.
> * Wasm Plugin: Allows loading and running WebAssembly modules in APISIX.
> * Prometheus Plugin: Optimizing long tail requests caused by excessive
> data volume in metrics.
> * proxy-control Plugin: The proxy-control Plugin dynamically controls
> the behavior of the NGINX proxy.
> * Real-ip Plugin: The real-ip Plugin is used to dynamically change the
> client's IP address and port as seen by APISIX.
>
>
> Although we still retain compatibility with OpenResty, in practice,
> the incompatibility issues between APISIX and OpenResty are often
> unresolved. Our usual approach is to skip these issues. Considering
> that APISIX will continue to add new features and bug fixes in the
> future, these features are often not supported in native OpenResty. At
> the same time, we also need to consider compatibility with OpenResty,
> which requires extra maintenance work in testing and development.
>
>
> By dropping support for OpenResty, we can remove extra CI jobs and
> version checks, making the code simpler.
>
> What about your opinion?
>

Reply via email to