Jeff Trawick wrote: > [...] > > I don't yet completely understand the current logic for deciding, but > part of it doesn't look right: > > AC_IFALLYES(custom:union_semun, > AC_DECIDE(USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE, [SysV IPC semget()])) > > AFAIK, this says that if have_union_semun is set, we'll use SysV > semaphores. But have_union_semun is rarely set since it is up to the > program to define union semun.
I'm getting APR_USE_FCNTL_SERIALIZE on Linux...thought we wanted SYSVSEM for 2.2 kernels per a recent post. Sounds like you're on to the source of the bogus-ity. Greg
