[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > As far as the current code to check for when to use SysV sems, I think
> > we should:
> >
> > 1) change the test to check for the presence of semctl() or semop(),
> > not the presence of union semun
> >
> > 2) move the AC_IFALLYES() for USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE to a point *after*
> > the fcntl() check since fcntl() is what we have used in the past on
> > almost all platforms and IMHO we should keep using it except for
> > platforms where we have specific information represented in hints.m4
>
> This would be moving backwards. This test was originally after the FCNTL
> test, but we moved it, I can't remember why. Please look this up before
> making this change.
of course you're right about the order!
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...