> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 6:05 PM > > Unfortunately, no. OtherBill just added a "misc" directory. If that were at > > the top level, nothing about it would indicate that it contains source code > > for the library. I worry similarly about the others. They are certainly > > clearer (e.g. it would be hard to imagine "buckets" as being part of the > > documentation :-), but it is *very* obvious that src/ contains the source > > for the library. > > Well, I have a general problem with a misc directory. And I added the > misc directory to APR, and I regret it now. If we can't quantify what is > in a directory, then we shouldn't have that directory IMHO. If we remove > the misc directory, and it is obvious what is in each directory, then we > might be okay removing the src directory.
Just a footnote... what is in misc/ could just as easily live in a helpers or build directory, it's nothing but an empty stub to eliminate compiler emits.
