> I spent a good amount of time trying to figure out the right > combination to allow us to include <string.h> and <strings.h> (which > is done by apr_want.h) without some redundant declaration warnings.
Can we change apr_want.h not to include <strings.h> if APR_HAVE_STRING_H is defined? > Removing redundant-decl was the easy fix, but I didn't think it was > the right fix. Removing POSIX_SOURCE is also the easy fix, but I > don't think the right fix :-) Well, it is certainly wrong to define _POSIX_SOURCE and then include <strings.h>, even if it doesn't happen to break anything at the moment like <sys/socket.h> does. I notice that apr_file_io.h also drags in <sys/uio.h>, also a non-POSIX header. Once again, _POSIX_SOURCE is not compatible with this behavior.
