Brian Havard wrote: > > Yeah, that's more how I see it. It's only really intended for OS/2 & maybe > a few other platforms that aren't supported by libtool. I wasn't trying to > start a revolution.... >
I think it's significant that there are (so far) 2 work-arounds in place for libtool, and that libtool has somewhat consistantly been the only real thorn in our build environment. :) I like how both basically are there to reduce libtool down to the bare requirements we need it for: (1) determine how to created loadable modules and (2) create archives. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody."
