On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:10:30AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: > It'd be nice if there was an apr_file_t_dup() [if you catch my drift... > I don't know what you'd really call it] that does everything > apr_file_dup() does *except* calling dup(). Then I'd have no problem at > all with this approach.
Why? Don't we need to create a duplicate file handle? What am I missing? -- justin
