On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > What about the case where the original apr_file_t is cleaned up > (i.e. closed) before we are done with the "new" apr_file_t? (This is > the whole purpose of setaside, right?) Won't that cause a problem > since the original descriptor has now been closed in kernel space? > We'll have ourselves a nice invalid file descriptor. Or, am I > wrong? -- justin
Oh crap, duh. You're 100% right. I now see the error of my ways. =-) -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
