Bill Stoddard wrote: > I have expressed my distaste for the "one mutex fits all" approach of APR for > quite a > while. +1 >
I'm thinking that one I implement the 2.0 version, it makes sense for the 1.3 tree as well (I know, feature creep). But it's also much easier under 1.3 :) -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "It's *good* to be the King."
