On 2 Jul 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> struct apr_os_lock_t {
> #if APR_HAS_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
> pthread_mutex_t *pthread_crossproc; /* NULL if not used */
> #endif
> #if APR_HAS_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE || APR_HAS_FCNTL_SERIALIZE ||
> APR_HAS_FLOCK_SERIALIZE
> int int_crossproc; /* -1 if not used */
> #endif
> #if APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
> pthread_mutex_t *pthread_intraproc; /* NULL if not used */
> #endif
> };
>
> in apr_os_lock_get():
>
> #if APR_HAS_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
> os->pthread_crossproc = lock->pthread_interproc;
> #endif
> #if APR_HAS_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE || APR_HAS_FCNTL_SERIALIZE ||
> APR_HAS_FLOCK_SERIALIZE
> os->int_crossproc = lock->interproc;
> #endif
> #if APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
> os->pthread_intraproc = lock->intraproc;
> #endif
>
That's essentially what Ryan did last night...
> In create_lock(), initialize as follows before filling in any lock handles:
>
> #if APR_HAS_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
> new->pthread_interproc = NULL;
> #endif
> #if APR_HAS_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE || APR_HAS_FCNTL_SERIALIZE ||
> APR_HAS_FLOCK_SERIALIZE
> new->interproc = -1;
> #endif
> #if APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
> new->intraproc = NULL;
> #endif
We didn't catch this part, though. The apr_lock_t is pcalloc'ed just
prior to calling create_lock(). Do we really need to do this? If so,
feel free to add it in...
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
