Aaron Bannert wrote:

I'd like to propose we add a call that gives a hint to the OS as to
the level of concurrency we wish to have. This would mirror
pthread_setconcurrency(), and would be a simple call to that on
operating systems that have it available. On other platforms it
would be simple noop.

Give me some +1s and I'll submit a patch.

-aaron


+1 IF the number you set it to is a hint, and solaris can changes the concurrency afterwards according to the load on the system/internal guidelines.

Oh...
I ran the the testlockperf code on the 8-way box, with
the pthread_setconcurrency calls commented out, and with
the concurrency calls put in (setting them to 8).
results are as follows

(without setconcurrency)
APR Lock Performance Test
==============

apr_lock(INTRAPROCESS, MUTEX) Lock Tests
    Initializing the apr_lock_t                             OK
    Starting all the threads                                OK
microseconds: 9373710 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
    Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t                     OK
    Starting all the threads                                OK
microseconds: 7304314 usec
apr_lock(INTRAPROCESS, READWRITE) Lock Tests
    Initializing the apr_lock_t                             OK
microseconds: 11247506 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
    Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t                     OK

microseconds: 8148914 usec

(with pthread_setconcurrency(8) where you put the comments)
APR Lock Performance Test
==============

apr_lock(INTRAPROCESS, MUTEX) Lock Tests
    Initializing the apr_lock_t                             OK
    Starting all the threads                                OK
microseconds: 20054346 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
    Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t                     OK
    Starting all the threads                                OK
microseconds: 16979410 usec
apr_lock(INTRAPROCESS, READWRITE) Lock Tests
    Initializing the apr_lock_t                             OK

--It just sits at this point....
(CVS Code is a couple of day old if that makes a difference)



Reply via email to