[narrowing down the to: list back to APR] On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 10:44:14AM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote: > On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 10:39, Sander Striker wrote: > > In subversion svn_string_t was introduced, because it wasn't in APR. > > It does (AFAIK) exactly what brian describes. > > > is there any reason NOT to introduce this into the APR now? > we could then slowly migrate strings to this
+1 I see no reason not to start adding this, as long as it's marked in some way to be experimental/incomplete while we're working on it. I assume we'll have to start duping some of our string functions to be able to use the new type? -aaron
