From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:46 PM
> [narrowing down the to: list back to APR] > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 10:44:14AM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 10:39, Sander Striker wrote: > > > In subversion svn_string_t was introduced, because it wasn't in APR. > > > It does (AFAIK) exactly what brian describes. > > > > > is there any reason NOT to introduce this into the APR now? > > we could then slowly migrate strings to this > > +1 > I see no reason not to start adding this, as long as it's marked > in some way to be experimental/incomplete while we're working on it. 'marked in some way' == branch. > I assume we'll have to start duping some of our string functions to > be able to use the new type? But of course ... and provide the a complete set of ISO C string functions?
