> From: Thom May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > wrowe 2002/07/15 00:42:35 > > > > Modified: . renames_pending > > Log: > > Two down. Don't know if I agree with the entire host of these > becoming > > apr_socket_ foo, but, well... I won't argue. > Please do. That was why I commited them, in the hopes of some > discussion...
Shoot, I've been in every other discussion this week. I'll just say this. The original names were to keep APR and POSIX names in sync. That was to leverage the huge number of POSIX programmers out there. We only used different names from POSIX when we were implementing something that POSIX doesn't have, or when our implementation didn't look anything like POSIX. Just a thought. Ryan
