> > From: Thom May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > > wrowe 2002/07/15 00:42:35 > > > > > > Modified: . renames_pending > > > Log: > > > Two down. Don't know if I agree with the entire host of these > > becoming > > > apr_socket_ foo, but, well... I won't argue. > > Please do. That was why I commited them, in the hopes of some > > discussion... > > Shoot, I've been in every other discussion this week. I'll just say > this. The original names were to keep APR and POSIX names in sync. > That was to leverage the huge number of POSIX programmers out there. We > only used different names from POSIX when we were implementing something > that POSIX doesn't have, or when our implementation didn't look anything > like POSIX. > > Just a thought. > > Ryan
I agree with Ryan here. I prefer the original 'POSIX friendly' names. We are causing pain to a lot of people by these gratuitous name changes. Bill
