"Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, the old design was completely bogus. As proof, Trawick vetoed even > using the damned thing inside of APR.
I listed two conditions for the veto: 1) something more complex than calling poll() in that situation 2) something slower than calling poll() in that situation It seems to me that the current code meets both conditions, though not as obnoxiously as code using the older apr_poll() interface would have. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
