Sander Striker wrote:
I'd like to keep the current code and see the mem leak fixed. That should for the moment suffice. For large pollsets a workable solution was provided, making the veto against the current code even harder to grok.
Which solution was the workable one for large pollsets? If you mean the malloc solution, I beg to differ. :-)
What do you think of splitting it into two APIs? I agree that the current API is okay for small descriptor sets--if only we could limit its use to cases where the number of descriptors really is small. One of my messages from yesterday has more details on this idea, http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=102731606500897
--Brian
