At 2:54 PM -0400 8/13/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> Toward the end of that last round of discussions, I thus proposed >> that APR get out of the business of managing microseconds: >> >> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=102678180413988 >> >> I'm interested in hearing people's comments on that proposal. > >Doesn't that completely ignore Cliff's message early in this thread that >specifically stated that he needed microsecond resolution?
Agreed. Just because Apache doesn't necessarily use/need it, is no reason to not include that in APR. >I continue to state that APR's time format should stay as it is. If you >want seconds, use time_t. The only change that I can see as appropriate, >is to make the interval_time_t a 32-bit value, which would mean that any >arithmetic on the intervals would be faster. Agreed here as well (regarding making the interval a 32 bit). -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
