On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:58:25AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > I don't understand. Is there something in httpd that would need el-kabong? > Flood could definately use it, but I really don't want to make flood > dependent on both httpd and APR, especially when flood is a _client_ > and the httpd _server_ project is a server. HTML is more general than > server-side HTTP, IMHO.
Umm, I think Jon just meant that it belongs as a subproject of httpd. I agree with that - it doesn't belong in APR. And, yes, I believe that httpd-2.0 can use el-kabong (much in the manner that Daniel described). Yes, I extend the focus of httpd to include clients as well. flood's there. So should serf and (possibly) el-kabong. To me, APR is only about raw system-level portability - not about producing portable libraries. I'm confused how that got distorted the way it has. -- justin
