> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 September 2002 00:36
> On 16/9/02 23:15, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Why did we choose libapr-#.so? Most other libraries use libapr.so.#, > > which allows you to continue to do -lapr. Is there a reason we chose to > > do something different??? > > Sgrunf???? Whatchasaying Ryan? > > $ ls -1a /opt/apache/lib/libapr* > /opt/apache/lib/libapr.a > /opt/apache/lib/libapr.la > /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so -> libapr.so.0.0.0 > /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so.0 -> libapr.so.0.0.0 > /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so.0.0.0 > /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.a > /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.la > /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so -> libaprutil.so.0.0.0 > /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so.0 -> libaprutil.so.0.0.0 > /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so.0.0.0 > $ > > Unless something changed in the past 3 weeks, this is how it works with > Apache... I hate to say it, but something changed the past 3 weeks... ;) Sander
