On 16/9/02 23:54, "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 17 September 2002 00:36 > >> On 16/9/02 23:15, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Why did we choose libapr-#.so? Most other libraries use libapr.so.#, >>> which allows you to continue to do -lapr. Is there a reason we chose to >>> do something different??? >> >> Sgrunf???? Whatchasaying Ryan? >> >> $ ls -1a /opt/apache/lib/libapr* >> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.a >> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.la >> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so -> libapr.so.0.0.0 >> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so.0 -> libapr.so.0.0.0 >> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so.0.0.0 >> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.a >> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.la >> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so -> libaprutil.so.0.0.0 >> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so.0 -> libaprutil.so.0.0.0 >> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so.0.0.0 >> $ >> >> Unless something changed in the past 3 weeks, this is how it works with >> Apache... > > I hate to say it, but something changed the past 3 weeks... ;) Sorry, was out of touch for a while... My main BetaVersion server and the backup one (friggin' Intel hardware) both died... Lost approximately 3 weeks of email, the WebApp/Jerry module source code (all of it), and other random bits and bobs... :-/ Didn't know, my bad! :) Pier (explaining also his silence of the past month or so)
