> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 September 2002 10:47
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 01:22:17AM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: > > Are you just bitching, or do you have a better design? Let's hear it. > > Oh, I'm fine with --enable-layout=classic which reverts Havoc's > model to what we had before. The key point for me is to allow > the admin not to be forced into a particular model. > > We can both co-exist in our little worlds - which is acceptable > to me (and I hope to you). You have your reasons for using that > model, I have my reasons for thinking it's overboard - which is > that a prefix containing an explicit version resolves the parallel > concerns (i.e. /opt/apr-0.9.0 or /opt/apr-0.9 or /opt/apr-0). If > you don't have a versioned prefix, yes, you need Havoc's model. > > It does make sense to make your design the default, since that lets > newbies configure it in a sensible (to them) manner. But, we should > have the flexibility to allow for circumstances where it isn't > helpful. -- justin What can I say? +1. Sander
