"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, if we choose to 'distribute' code, e.g. binary builds, and those > would (by virtue of our choices) require a GPL distribution, that's not only > earning a non-technical -1, but an outright outrageous position for the > Chairman of the ASF to hold. Of course, I don't suppose that is what > you meant in this message. > > If we plug in some ./configure style choices for the 'non-unix' platforms, > that earns my wholehearted +1. In this case, it's nothing less than you > can do when using ./configure on unix to a GNU distro of iconv.
This was about the latter, yes.
