On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:21:36AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Colm MacC�rthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +0000, Colm MacC�rthaigh wrote: > > > My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS , > > > with the 2.0.43 codebase, because CVS seems broken right now. > > > > stupid pre-test patch, here's the real one: > > patch looks basically right to me... probably is exactly right... > unless somebody beats me to it I'll play with it and commit it... nag > me directly if it isn't committed in 36 hours or so :)
Cool :-) > as David Reid reminded, the flag needs to default to 0 on the right > Linux boxen... unless/until we get specific info, I plan to tweak > your patch to default it to --disable when building on Linux 2.4.x... > relatively few users who would encounter the problem are going to be > as able as you to dig to the bottom of it, and the symptoms mentioned > in subsequent bug reports may not trigger the right questions on the > part of the developers... Well, all I can say for certain is 2.4.18 is broken. > In the interest of tying up loose ends, I'm still concerned with your > observation that --disable-sendfile didn't do the right thing... did > you "make distclean" before re-configuring? The problem there was that --disable-sendfile isnt an option configure knows anything about, the right one is --without-sendfile, which does work, and does fix the problem. :-) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] PubKey: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://devnull.redbrick.dcu.ie/
