On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:21:36AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Colm MacC�rthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +0000, Colm MacC�rthaigh wrote: > > > My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS , > > > with the 2.0.43 codebase, because CVS seems broken right now. > > > > stupid pre-test patch, here's the real one: > > patch looks basically right to me... probably is exactly right... > unless somebody beats me to it I'll play with it and commit it... nag > me directly if it isn't committed in 36 hours or so :)
It would seem prudent to confirm this is a kernel bug before adding a workaround to APR. APR's test/sendfile works fine here over IPv6 between two 2.4.18-based kernels (RHL 8.0), and is doing basically the same thing as httpd, albeit without the TCP_NODELAY - maybe that makes a difference. Colm, can you try running the apr/test/sendfile binary with your machines? I used it like: one$ ./sendfile server two$ ./sendfile client blocking <address-of-one> Regards, joe
