On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:41:14PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Friday, January 03, 2003 14:15:27 -0600 Karl Fogel > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there a place where dev snapshots of Apache HEAD are released, so > > we can point to that instead? > > Six hour CVS snapshots are at: http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/apr/
Unfortuantely, they disappear, so we can't refer to specific snapshots. We can certainly point people at them, however. > But, the changes here isn't in httpd HEAD, but apr HEAD. I believe the > current plan is to include apr/apr-util HEAD with all stable httpd (i.e. > 2.0.x) releases. Sander is the current .44 httpd RM, so he has final say. If I can find the time, then I'd like to do a formal release of 0.9.2 of apr(-util). That will certainly help us out a good bit. > Note that stable httpd will not be able to use APR 1.0 though - because the > current plan is that we're going to drop all deprecated functions at that > branch point - httpd 2.0.x will be fixed at the moment right before APR 1.0 > is released. Seems that we could fix httpd today, no? Delete all deprecated functions (in the working copy) and see what breaks in httpd? > That's going to be interesting from the Subversion perspective though. We > may be forced *not* to use APR 1.0 because httpd-2.0 won't work with it. > It's fun, isn't it? Perhaps we'll relax this policy and not drop > deprecated functions until APR 2.0, but that's an awful lot of cruft to > keep around for a long time. -- justin Hmm? Are we saying that the APR API is "part of" the httpd API, so httpd won't upgrade to an APR that is missing functions? Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
