On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:56:52PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >... > --On Friday, January 03, 2003 13:52:12 -0800 Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > If I can find the time, then I'd like to do a formal release of 0.9.2 of > > apr(-util). That will certainly help us out a good bit. > > apr-util needs to be able to build without having apr in ../apr. That's > the showstopper, IMHO.
Is that new from 0.9.1? If not, then 0.9.2 can go out the door, too. And is that requirement *just* for buildconf, or the actual build, too? > > Hmm? Are we saying that the APR API is "part of" the httpd API, so httpd > > won't upgrade to an APR that is missing functions? > > Yes. Any changes to APR that break binary compatibility can't be included > in any stable release of httpd-2.0 because a module could have used that > function. People have been very adamant about that requirement. -- justin Bah. APR should be able to go its own way. If httpd wants to stick with 0.9.9, then they can. And if we want to branch the pre-1.0 stuff to continue fixes for httpd, then fine. But APR 1.0 should drop the deprecated functions. APR cannot and should not be held hostage to httpd's requirements. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
